Bus 705 gold coast, Нарита (NRT)
Als je tussen de velden met metershoge planten doorrijdt komen gelijk beelden van menig horrorfilm naar boven. He has publicly admitted his involvement in the events of that led to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol, which he has publicly defended, including in an interview published on the gazetacrimea. Although we were keen to leave, we accepted a tour of the hotel and to be told about its history - see photo.
There were the occasional tantalising stretches of a few hundred metres of tarmac before reverting back to the corrugated clay. It was horrible. But we did. Did I mention it was awful? Eventually we came to the end of the gravel road and then turned onto Highway 7 with our fingers crossed that we would not have to take Bertha down another corrugated road again. Up early and walked to the snorkelling beaches only to find that the waves were still to big and the sea too murky.
We walked around the beach and collected any rubbish we came across, fishing lines, hooks, plastic etc. Back to Bertha to pack up. Drove to the beach in front of where we stayed and went for a swim and a sunbathe. While we were wandering around, Bun managed to step on a twig that had massive thorns on it; one went through her flip flop and into her foot.
We have two first aid kits and both were pretty useless. We managed to clean the wound and put a plaster on it, but it was not disinfected so we needed to improve our kit and buy some TCP or similar We found a cafe overlooking the marina and planned where to go next.
Do we carry on north and then race back, or go inland to see what happens there? We decided to go inland. Next stop will be Mount Coolon Hotel on the way to the gem fields. We started off by missing the turning we wanted to take onto Highway An impressive name, better than Route We turned back to find the road and set off down it.
The directions were simple, travel for km and then go straight across the roundabout, then travel for another 80km and turn right. We were concerned that the road may not be sealed, ie no tarmac. We w ere on the red earth associated with inland Australia. We managed speeds of around 50mph and everyone was comfortable. The sun was going down and we could see great plumes of dust approaching as a vehicle came towards us. Fortunately the vehicle was simply a large SUV ute - utility and the wind was blowing across the road away from our carriage so all was well.
The red clay gave way to a harder and whiter clay that had been baked into ridges. We had read about corrugated roads and, at times, it felt exactly like that. It was good to turn off the road and pull up outside the hotel.
There was bloke Bill sat outside the bar, he was waiting for his wife. He installs cattle handling equipment and this area is big in cattle. The farms average 60, acres with one of over , The drought is causing all of the farms to reduce their stock levels.
Liz, the owner of the hotel told us where we could park. The site is free of charge but offers electric plus toilets and showers. We hooked up and decided to spend the evening in the bar. We chatted to the locals. Their language was as colourful as their lives are tough. Expletives, including words no longer widely used in England, were so frequent that they made up almost the entire sentence.
They also have to sort the cattle etc. The cattle sound a bit wild and not too amenable to being bought in, sorted, castrated, tagged etc. Kat, one of the girls in the bar, works doing contract fencing, outside in the heat all day. None of them gets paid much, but they do get their board and lodgings. We went off to be at about We heard the utes leave just before midnight. In the morning, one was parked on the other side of the road with a pair of feet hanging out of the window.
One of the girls had decided to sleep in her car. La magie continue ce matin. Nous marchons 30 minutes, observons la plage depuis un point de vue en hauteur, puis descendons sur cette fameuse plage. Путешественник Super.
Wenn uns eines hier lockt dann sind es Tiersichtungen. Leider mussten wir heute feststellen, dass die Google Fahrzeiten hier nicht unbedingt stimmen. Die Szenerie war trotzdem mega spannend. Wir hoffen nur das wir noch rechtzeitig ankommen.
Heute wollen wir Playtypus, also Schnabeltiere beobachten. Wir waren total aufgeregt. Still stehen, ruhig sein und beobachten. Nach und nach sahen wir immer mehr auftauchen und kurz schwimmen.
Philipp musste auf die linke Spur ausweichen damit nichts passiert. Oder waren etwa wir die Idioten auf der falschen Seite? Путешественник Erstmal noch nicht.
On our way south we left the coast for a while to visit the rainforest of the Eungella National Park. In the park we saw some platypus and enjoyed some small walks through the rainforest. Aber nach dieser Nacht geht es dann fast bis nach Rockhampton. Das sind fast 5 5tunden auf dem Bruce Highway. Путешественник wie coooool. Путешественник Das ist ja wirklich mal was richtig tolles Bij het weggaan vanuit de Blackdown Tablelands stoppen we bij het Yaddamen Dhina uitzichtpunt.
Hier kijk je uit over de tafelbergen en het daarachter gelegen platte laagland. We dalen de steile weg af in de laagste versnelling, door de omvang van de bus wil deze zich anders alleen maar van de berg storten. We tanken nog bij in de volgende plaats, je kan nooit genoeg benzine hebben en beginnen aan een paar honderd kilometer door niemandsland. De weg is redelijk goed, dus we kunnen meestal aanhouden. Er is wel redelijk wat verkeer in de tegengestelde richting.
Gedurende een paar uur passeren we twee plaatsen, de weg gaat vooral langs uitgestrekte weidelanden, met af en toe wat koeien. Het is een saaie rit, totdat we achterop een zeer zwaar transport rijden.
Deze bestaat uit een oplegger met daarop een enorme rups, waarschijnlijk een onderstel van een mijnbouw voertuig. De vracht neemt de volledige breedte van de weg in beslag, alle tegenliggers worden door de politie escorte in de berm gezet. Wij mogen gelukkig na even al passeren als de weg net breed genoeg is.
In Nebo stoppen we bij een picknickplaats voor de lunch. Er zijn geregeld zulke plaatsen om uit te rusten, blijkbaar vallen er aardig wat verkeersdoden.
Ook wordt met autowrakken soms duidelijk gemaakt wat je kan overkomen. Hierna rijden we nog een uur door bosrijk gebied waarna we afdalen naar de kustregio van Mackay. Dit is een vallei die aan drie kanten wordt omgeven met heuvels en bijna helemaal wordt gebruikt om suikerriet te verbouwen. Als je tussen de velden met metershoge planten doorrijdt komen gelijk beelden van menig horrorfilm naar boven. In Marian doen we boodschappen wat is het drukkend heet hier en rijden daarna door de suikerriet velden door de vallei totdat het niet meer kan.
Daar gaat de weg via veel haarspeldbochten slingerend omhoog. Ook hier is er een flink stijgingspercentage, onze bus heeft het zwaar te verduren. Na 5km zijn we boven en hebben we een prachtig uitzicht over de vallei waardoor we net gereden zijn. Een paar kilometer verderop ligt het Broken River Camp waar we vannacht slapen. Dit is een kleine camping met 8 plaatsen op een grasveld in het Eungella N. Ons doel hier is het zien van vogelbekdieren platypus welke erg schuw zijn.
He has supported the annexation of Crimea in public statements, including on his profile on the United Russia Crimean branch website and a press article published on NTV website on 3 July He has admitted his personal involvement in the events of that led to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol, which he publicly supported, including in an interview published on gazetakrimea. Member of the State Duma, elected from the illegally annexed city of Sevastopol.
He has publicly admitted his involvement in the events of that led to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol, which he publicly defended, including on his personal website and in an interview published on 21 February on nation-news. He has publicly admitted his involvement in the events of that led to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol, which he has publicly defended, including in an interview published on the gazetacrimea. She has been a member of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea since and as of March supported the integration of the illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol into the Russian Federation.
She has defended the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol on numerous occasions in public statements, including interviews published on the c-pravda. He has publicly admitted, including in an interview published on ldpr-rk. This decision contributes to establishing an independent power supply for Crimea and Sevastopol as a means of supporting their separation from Ukraine, and undermines the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Former Head of Department in the Energy Ministry of the Russian Federation and responsible within the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation for the development of electro-energetic projects in Crimea. These projects contribute to establishing an independent power supply for Crimea and Sevastopol as a means of supporting their separation from Ukraine, and undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
This contributes to establishing an independent power supply for Crimea and Sevastopol as a means of supporting their separation from Ukraine, and undermines the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. In this capacity, he has worked for further integration of the illegally annexed Crimean peninsula into the Russian Federation, and is as such responsible for actively supporting or implementing actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence of Ukraine.
Deputy Chair of the Crimea Electoral Commission. In this capacity, she participated in the organisation of the Russian presidential elections of 18 March , regional and local elections of 8 September , and State Duma election in September in the illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol, and thereby actively supported and implemented policies that undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Secretary of the Crimea Electoral Commission. Former Chair of the Sevastopol Electoral Commission. In this capacity he participated in the organisation of the Russian presidential elections of 18 March in the illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol, and thereby actively supported and implemented policies that undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Head of the internal policy department of the administration of Novorossiysk since March In this capacity she participated in the organisation of the Russian presidential elections of 18 March in the illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol, and thereby actively supported and implemented policies that undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
In taking on and acting in this capacity, he actively supported and implemented actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. In this capacity, he was responsible for actions of the coast guard naval fleet of the Russian Federation against Ukraine on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels.
Those actions also supported the consolidation of the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula into the Russian Federation. In this capacity, he participated in operations against Ukrainian ships and their crew during the actions of the Russian Federation against Ukraine on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels.
Those actions prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels. He was in command of the vessel that actively participated in actions of the Russian Federation against Ukrainian vessels and their crew on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels.
He participated in operations against Ukrainian vessels during the actions of the Russian Federation against Ukrainian vessels and their crews on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels.
In this role, he was responsible for coordinating the actions of Russian Federation forces against Ukrainian vessels and their crews on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels.
Commander of the Southern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces, Army General and responsible for military forces in the region, including illegally annexed Crimea and Sevastopol. In this role, he was responsible for the actions of the Black Sea Fleet and other military forces of the Russian Federation against Ukraine on 25 November which prevented access by Ukrainian vessels to their coast on the Sea of Azov, thereby undermining the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and undermining the security of Ukraine through the disruption of the movements and operability of Ukrainian naval vessels.
Former Head of the Sevastopol Electoral Commission. In that capacity, he participated in the organisation of the local elections in the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol on 8 September and thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
In this capacity, she participated in the organisation of the local elections in the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol on 8 September and thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Secretary of the Sevastopol Electoral Commission. In taking on and acting in this capacity, she has worked for further integration of the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation and thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
In taking on and acting in this capacity, he has worked for further integration of the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation and thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Therefore, he supports the consolidation of the illegally annexed Crimean peninsula into the Russian Federation, which in turn further undermines the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Former Deputy General Director for infrastructure projects at Stroigazmontazh SGM who since had supervised the construction of the bridge over the Kerch Strait including the railway part of the bridge connecting Russia and the illegally annexed Crimean peninsula.
He took multiple biased decisions in politically motivated cases against opponents of the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. He thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies that undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He prosecuted the pro-Ukrainian activists oppressed for opposing the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation. He filed charges with a court in the Russian Federation against the Ukrainian citizens who had been forcibly transferred from the occupied Crimean Peninsula.
He has been involved in politically motivated criminal investigations against the leaders of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People prosecuted for their active opposition to the illegal annexation of the Crimean Peninsula. He thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies, which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He led FSB forces, which have intensified the oppression campaign against the opponents of the illegal occupation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation.
Address: 35 Marshala Zhukova St, App. She took multiple biased decisions in politically motivated cases against opponents of the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. She thereby actively supported actions and implemented policies, which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Passport number, national ID number, other numbers of identity documents: 03 01 He has led the work of the criminal investigators, and thereby he actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Dimitriy Utkin, a former Russian military intelligence GRU officer, is the founder of the Wagner Group and responsible for coordinating and planning operations for the deployment of Wagner Group mercenaries in Ukraine. In his commanding position within the Wagner Group, he was personally present on the combat field in Ukraine coordinating and planning the activities of Wagner members. Given his commanding position, he is thus responsible for and has actively implemented actions which have undermined and threatened the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
He fought in Donbas in the separatist Steppe battalion, where he commanded a portable anti-aircraft missile complex platoon.
He admitted that he personally shot down a Ukrainian helicopter and two Su aircraft while in Donbas. Thereby he actively supported actions and implemented policies, which undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Address: Possibly: Astrakhan, Kirovskiy rayon, Raskolnikova 11 app. He fought in Donbas for the pro-Russian separatist forces as a member of a portable anti-aircraft missile complex military unit within the pro-Russian separatist Steppe battalion which shot down an Ukrainian helicopter and two Su aircraft in Donbas.
Furthermore, he voted in favour of resolution No. In taking on and acting in this capacity, she has worked for further integration of the illegally annexed City of Sevastopol into the Russian Federation.
Furthermore, she voted in favour of resolution No. Thereby she has actively supported actions and implemented policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. In taking on and acting in this capacity, she actively supported and implemented actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine. During the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych and thanks to the personal connection with a group of persons close to his father, he assembled an array of business interests and accumulated a great fortune.
He still runs his business activities in the Donbass region controlled by the separatists groups, especially in the energy, coal, construction, banking and real estate sectors. Therefore, Oleksandr Yanukovych is responsible for supporting or implementing actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine and he conducted transactions with the separatist groups in the Donbas region of Ukraine. From until , Viktor Yanukovych was President of Ukraine.
He pursued a pro-Russian policy when in office. A Ukrainian court found Viktor Yanukovych guilty of treason for having invited the Russian Federation to invade Ukraine.
After being removed from power, he relocated to Russia, from where he has continued his activities aimed at destabilising Ukraine. He assisted in the Russian military interference in Ukraine by calling on the President of the Russian Federation to send Russian troops to Ukraine in March Viktor Yanukovych supported pro-Russian politicians who held public offices in occupied Crimea. In , a new pre-trial investigation in Ukraine was opened according to which Mr Viktor Yanukovych, together with two former Ministers of Defence, has purposefully reduced the defence capacity of Ukraine, particularly in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.
He considers himself as the legitimate President of Ukraine and has consistently presented a pro-Russian stance in his public interventions. According to different sources, Mr Viktor Yanukovych has been part of a Russian special operation, aimed at replacing the Ukrainian President with him, during the first phases of the unprovoked illegal military aggression against Ukraine.
Mr Serhiy Kurchenko is a Ukrainian businessman. With support from pro-Russia separatists, he took control of several large metallurgical, chemical and energy plants in the separatist-held areas of Donbas.
He organised and benefitted from the illegal scheme of exporting Donbas coal to Russia and Europe despite EU sanctions. Mr Kurchenko helped large Russian companies and State-owned holdings to bypass EU restrictive measures by acting as their sub-contractor in the Russian-held territories. He has been an intermediary in Russian gas, fuel and electricity exports to the separatist-held parts of Donbas, which strengthened their independent energy supplies and undermined their economic integration with Ukraine.
Moreover, he delivered fuel to the illegally occupied Crimean Peninsula. By doing so, he strengthened the independent power supplies of this territory. He also owns the largest oil depot on the Crimean Peninsula.
He thereby benefitted from Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea and the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine, conducted transactions with the separatist groups in the Donbas region of Ukraine, and actively supported actions and policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
He has made public comments about Crimea being and remaining Russian. Under his command and orders, Russian troops have held military drills in the illegally annexed Crimea and have been positioned at the border. He is ultimately responsible for any military action against Ukraine. He is therefore responsible for actively supporting and implementing actions and policies that undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, as well as stability and security in Ukraine.
Anton Vaino also attends meetings on the socio-economic development of Crimea and Sevastopol. He is therefore responsible for actively supporting and implementing actions and policies that undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine as well as stability and security in Ukraine.
In this capacity, he is responsible for Russian governmental policies about occupied Crimea, including providing water to Crimea and Sevastopol. He is therefore responsible for actions and policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, as well as stability and security in Ukraine.
In his former capacity of Deputy Director of the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation, Grigorenko was responsible for setting up new local tax legislation for the territory of Crimea following its annexation in He is therefore responsible for actions and policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine.
He is also responsible for providing financial and material support, and benefitting from Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea or the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine. He has made public statements outlining the plans and priorities of the government of the Russian Federation concerning the economic development of Crimea and Sevastopol.
As such, he is responsible for any maritime operation of the Russian navy, including in or to Ukraine. He is therefore responsible for actively supporting and implementing actions and policies that undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine as well as the stability or security in Ukraine. As such, he is responsible for naval operations in or to Ukraine.
As such, he is responsible for any maritime operation in or to Ukraine through the Black Sea and for restricting the freedom of navigation in the Black Sea. He is therefore responsible for actively supporting and implementing actions and policies that undermine and threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, as well as the stability or security in Ukraine. As such, he is responsible for Russian ground operations in or to Ukraine.
As such, he is responsible for air operations in or to Ukraine. She is the owner of other companies with links to his son.
She is associated with Yevgeny Prigozhin, who is responsible for the deployment of Wagner Group mercenaries in Ukraine and for benefitting from large public contracts with the Russian Ministry of Defence following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia and occupation of Eastern Ukraine by Russia-backed separatists. She has therefore supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. Denis Bortnikov is the son of, and as such is associated with, Alexander Bortnikov — Director of the Federal Security Service FSB and Permanent member of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, who is involved in shaping the policy of the Russian Government threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
He is therefore also supporting financially Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea and the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine.
He has made public statements supporting the annexation of Crimea and encouraging Russian citizens to vacation in Crimea. He is also associated with, and according to media reports is an owner of, a winery and a luxurious hotel in Crimea. He is therefore supporting actions and policies that undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine and benefitting from the annexation of Crimea.
In this capacity he made remarks stating that Russian would change budget rules to reflect an additional two million in population after the illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation. He is therefore supporting actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Margarita Simonyan is a central figure of the Government propaganda. Through her function, she promoted a positive attitude to the annexation of Crimea and the actions of separatists in Donbas. Therefore, she supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
As a central figure of the government propaganda, she promoted the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine. Solovyov is known for his extremely hostile attitude towards Ukraine and praise of the Russian government. Therefore, he is responsible for supporting actions or policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. He therefore actively supported and implemented actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine.
Address of the reception office in the Russian Federation: 51 Lenina St. Telephone and fax numbers of the reception office in the Russian Federation: He is therefore responsible for supporting actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Central figure of the Government propaganda, he frequently takes position in favour of the annexation of Crimea. Therefore, he is responsible for supporting actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Function: prominent businessman, with close ties to Russian political leadership. He is the funder and unofficial head of the Wagner Group, a Russia-based unincorporated military entity, responsible for the deployment of Wagner Group mercenaries in Ukraine.
He is thus responsible for and has actively implemented actions which have undermined and threatened the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
He has also been benefitting from Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea and the destabilisation of Eastern Ukraine. Member of the State Duma who voted in favour of the resolution No. Member of the State Duma since 19 September Propagandist on Russian television. Therefore, he has supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised Ukraine.
All funds and economic resources belonging to, owned, held or controlled by any natural or legal persons, entities or bodies, or natural or legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, as listed in Annex I, shall be frozen. No funds or economic resources shall be made available, directly or indirectly, to or for the benefit of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies, or natural or legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, as listed in Annex I.
Article 2 2 shall not apply to funds or economic resources made available by organisations and agencies which are pillar-assessed by the Union and with which the Union has signed a financial framework partnership agreement on the basis of which the organisations and agencies act as humanitarian partners of the Union, provided that the provision of such funds or economic resources is necessary for exclusively humanitarian purposes in Ukraine.
In cases not covered by paragraph 1 of this Article, and by way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities may grant specific or general authorisations, under such general or specific conditions as they deem appropriate, to release certain frozen funds or economic resources or to make available certain funds or economic resources, provided that the provision of such funds or economic resources is necessary for exclusively humanitarian purposes in Ukraine.
In the absence of a negative decision, a request for information or a notification for additional time from the competent authority within 5 working days of the date of receipt of a request for authorisation under paragraph 2, the authorisation shall be considered granted. The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraphs 2 and 3 within 2 weeks of the authorisation.
Annex I shall include: a. Annex I shall include the grounds for the listing of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies concerned. Annex I shall include, where available, information necessary to identify the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies concerned.
With regard to natural persons, such information may include names including aliases, date and place of birth, nationality, passport and ID card numbers, gender, address, if known, and function or profession. With regard to legal persons, entities and bodies, such information may include names, place and date of registration, registration number and place of business.
By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of the Member States may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, after having determined that the funds or economic resources concerned are: a.
The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraph 1.
By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of the Member States may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, if the following conditions are met: a. By way of derogation from Article 2 and provided that a payment by a natural or legal person, entity or body listed in Annex I is due under a contract or agreement that was concluded by, or under an obligation that arose for the natural or legal person, entity or body concerned, before the date on which that natural or legal person, entity or body was included in Annex I, the competent authorities of the Member States may authorise, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, provided that the competent authority concerned has determined that: a.
The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraph 1, within two weeks of the authorisation.
By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the entities listed under entry numbers 79, 80, 81 and 82 in Annex I, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to those entities, under such conditions as the competent authorities deem appropriate and after having determined that such funds or economic resources are necessary for the termination by 9 October , of operations, contracts, or other agreements, including correspondent banking relations, concluded with those entities before 8 April By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the entity listed under entry number in Annex I, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to that entity, under such conditions as the competent authorities deem appropriate and after having determined that such funds or economic resources are necessary for the termination by 22 August , of operations, contracts, or other agreements, including correspondent banking relations, concluded with that entity before 21 July By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to the entity listed under entry number in Annex I, after having determined that the funds or economic resources are necessary for the completion, by 31 October , of an ongoing sale and transfer of proprietary rights directly or indirectly owned by that entity in a legal person, entity or body established in the Union.
By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the entity listed under entry number in Annex I, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to that entity, under such conditions as the competent authorities deem appropriate and after having determined that such funds or economic resources are necessary for the termination by 7 January of operations, contracts or other agreements concluded with, or otherwise involving, that entity before 3 June The Member State concerned shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under this Article within two weeks of the authorisation.
By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, the release of certain frozen economic resources, after having determined that: a. By way of derogation from Article 2, the competent authorities of a Member State may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the entities listed under entry numbers 53, 54, 55, 79, 80, 81, 82 and in Annex I, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to those entities, under such conditions as the competent authorities deem appropriate and after having determined that such funds or economic resources are necessary for the purchase, import or transport of agricultural and food products, including wheat and fertilisers.
Article 2 2 shall not prevent the crediting of the frozen accounts by financial or credit institutions that receive funds transferred by third parties onto the account of a listed natural or legal person, entity or body, provided that any additions to such accounts will also be frozen. The financial or credit institution shall inform the relevant competent authority about any such transaction without delay.
Article 2 2 shall not apply to the addition to frozen accounts of: a. Notwithstanding the applicable rules concerning reporting, confidentiality and professional secrecy, natural and legal persons, entities and bodies shall: a. Any additional information received directly by the Commission shall be made available to the Member States. Any information provided or received in accordance with this Article shall be used only for the purposes for which it was provided or received.
The competent authorities of the Member States, including enforcement authorities and administrators of official registers wherein natural persons, legal persons, entities and bodies as well as immovable or movable property are registered, shall process and exchange information. It shall be prohibited to participate, knowingly and intentionally, in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent the measures referred to in Article 2.
Natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex I, shall: a. Failure to comply with paragraph 2 shall be considered as participation, as referred to in paragraph 1, in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent the measures referred to in Article 2. The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission within two weeks of the information received pursuant to paragraph 2 a. The obligation in paragraph 2 a shall not apply until 1 January with regard to funds or economic resources located in a Member State that had laid down a similar reporting obligation under national law before 21 July The freezing of funds and economic resources or the refusal to make funds or economic resources available, carried out in good faith on the basis that such action is in accordance with this Regulation, shall not give rise to liability of any kind on the part of the natural or legal person or entity or body implementing it, or its directors or employees, unless it is proved that the funds and economic resources were frozen or withheld as a result of negligence.
Actions by natural or legal persons, entities or bodies shall not give rise to any liability of any kind on their part if they did not know, and had no reasonable cause to suspect, that their actions would infringe the measures set out in this Regulation. No claims in connection with any contract or transaction the performance of which has been affected, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, by the measures imposed under this Regulation, including claims for indemnity or any other claim of this type, such as a claim for compensation or a claim under a guarantee, particularly a claim for extension or payment of a bond, guarantee or indemnity, particularly a financial guarantee or financial indemnity, of whatever form, shall be satisfied, if they are made by: a.
In any proceedings for the enforcement of a claim, the onus of proving that satisfying the claim is not prohibited by paragraph 1 shall be on the natural or legal person, entity or body seeking the enforcement of that claim.
This Article is without prejudice to the right of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in paragraph 1 to judicial review of the legality of the non-performance of contractual obligations in accordance with this Regulation.
The Member States shall immediately inform each other and the Commission of any other relevant information at their disposal which might affect the effective implementation of this Regulation. Where the Council decides to subject a natural or legal person, entity or body to the measures referred to in Article 2, it shall amend Annex I accordingly.
The Council shall communicate its decision, including the grounds for listing, to the natural or legal person, entity or body referred to in paragraph 1, either directly, if the address is known, or through the publication of a notice, providing such natural or legal person, entity or body with an opportunity to present observations.
Where observations are submitted, or where substantial new evidence is presented, the Council shall review its decision and inform the natural or legal person, entity or body accordingly. The list in Annex I shall be reviewed at regular intervals and at least every 12 months. Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties, including as appropriate criminal penalties, applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented.
The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Member States shall also provide for appropriate measures of confiscation of the proceeds of such infringements. Member States shall notify the rules referred to in paragraph 1 to the Commission without delay after the entry into force of this Regulation and shall notify it of any subsequent amendment.
Member States shall designate the competent authorities referred to in this Regulation and identify them on the websites listed in Annex II. Member States shall notify the Commission of any changes in the addresses of their websites listed in Annex II. Member States shall notify the Commission of their competent authorities, including the contact details of those competent authorities, without delay after the entry into force of this Regulation, and shall notify it of any subsequent amendment.
Where this Regulation sets out a requirement to notify, inform or otherwise communicate with the Commission, the address and other contact details to be used for such communication shall be those indicated in Annex II. Identifying information. Date of listing. Gender: male DOB: Gender: male DOB: 5. Gender: male DOB: 9. Gender: male DOB: 3. Gender: male DOB: 4. Gender: male DOB: 2. Since holds the position of General Director in a State corporation.
Gender: male DOB: 1. Gender: female DOB: 7. Gender: female DOB: 9. Gender: male DOB: 7. Former Governor of the Ukrainian annexed city of Sevastopol. Head of Northern Ossetia since 19 September Gender: male DOB: 8. Gender: male DOB: 6. Remains an active military fighter of the LNR. Remains active in supporting separatist activity in eastern Ukraine. Advisor to the Governor of Sevastopol.
Subject to criminal proceedings in Ukraine. Remains active in supporting separatist policies. Gender: female DOB: Prosecutor of the Republic of Adygea.
